An agent-driven copilot that proactively analyzes, orchestrates, and acts across enterprise decisioning workflows.
Agentic AIEnterprise UX2025
TL;DR
A blue-sky exploration of agentic AI in SAS Viya, shaping how humans collaborate with intelligent systems in enterprise decisioning.
The work defines how agents can be legible, trustworthy, and controllable through end-to-end scenarios and key UX touchpoints—laying the foundation for a cohesive, enterprise-ready agentic AI experience.
I was one of four designers on this exploratory project, contributing domain expertise in intelligent decisioning to shape agentic AI in SAS Viya.
We moved from rapid brainstorming and AI-assisted research to defining a focused use case—conducting competitive analysis, mapping user journeys, and developing end-to-end mockups. The final concept was presented to stakeholders, gaining leadership alignment and paving the way for potential implementation.
My contributions included:
Collaborating cross-functionally in a fast-moving, ambiguous environment.
Designing a multimodal interaction framework for Viya Copilot.
Synthesizing explorations into a cohesive set of design foundations.
Challenges & Approach
Working through ambiguity
Every constraint shaped the design process — tight time, unclear scope, and a complex multi-product ecosystem each demanded a distinct response.
Challenges
01
Tight timeline
Limited time to research, explore, and validate design directions before delivery.
02
High ambiguity at the start
Unclear scope and open questions made it difficult to know where to begin.
03
Complex cross-product experience
SAS Viya spans many applications. Designing a seamless end-to-end Copilot flow required deep understanding of the ecosystem.
Approach
AI-assisted
Accelerate research with AI tools
Used AI to rapidly explore use cases and map user journeys, compressing weeks of discovery into days.
Alignment
Workshops & stakeholder alignment
Ran structured workshops and cross-team discussions to define goals and unblock the design process.
Systems thinking
Research → Wireframe → Happy path
Mapped key Viya products into a unified user flow, resolved cross-app handoffs, and delivered a smooth end-to-end journey.
Research Highlights
Three lenses on how enterprise users relate to AI agency
01
Workshop & Exploration
Cross-functional workshops with PMs, data scientists, and ML engineers to map the decision-making landscape. Sessions surfaced deep tensions between automation desire and accountability concerns.
WorkshopAssumption MappingAffinity Clustering
View larger
02
AI-Assisted Journey Mapping
Leveraged AI tooling to accelerate synthesis of interview transcripts into annotated journey maps, surfacing recurring friction at handoff moments where human judgment and machine action intersect.
User InterviewsAI SynthesisJourney Mapping
View larger
03
Future-State Experience Models
Speculative experience models depicting how user archetypes interact with agentic AI across short, medium, and long-term horizons — stress-tested in concept evaluation sessions.
Speculative DesignConcept EvaluationScenarios
View larger
Direction Shift
From autonomous vision to near-term copilot
Early concepts explored a long-term, autonomous vision — a dashboard-like system where agents proactively monitor and act with minimal user intervention.
Through stakeholder alignment, we shifted toward a more practical MVP: a chat-based interaction within Viya Copilot, enabling step-by-step collaboration while gradually introducing agentic behaviors.
Before — Dashboard with fully multi-agent autonomy
View larger
→
After — Coordinated agent ecosystem
View larger
Design Evolution
How the interface matured across three iterations
Each version of the Copilot side panel addressed a specific friction point — from raw text output to structured, agent-aware communication that builds user trust incrementally.
Problem
Dense prose, hard to scan
All three analysis sections run together. Users must read the full response to find the insight they need.
Problem
Hyperlink attribution
Agent source appears as a plain hyperlink mid-paragraph — easy to miss, low trust signal for the analysis origin.
Problem
No progressive disclosure
The full analysis is always visible with no way to collapse, focus, or step through sections at the user's own pace.
Note
The raw text format was fast to prototype and surfaced all the information at once — but user feedback indicated the response felt like a "wall of text." Analysts had trouble quickly extracting the specific section relevant to their current task, and the agent attribution was nearly invisible.
S
SAS Viya
Opened reports (1)
System stability
Medium priority
99.5%
Uptime last quarter
Customer feedback
High priority
85%
Positive from surveys
Manufacturing output (% change)
20%30%40%50%
Overlapping customers
7
Credit-risk + fraud data
Confidence score
0.87
Combined signal strength
Insight summary
These overlaps suggest that some late payments may be driven by suspicious activity, not just market stress.
SAS Viya Copilot
Hi, can you help me check borrower payment patterns with macroeconomic triggers to identify early signs of financial distress?
Sure, Priya. I've run an analysis through the Payment Pattern Analyzer and Macro Trigger Monitor. Here's what's showing up:
Key findings:
About 12% of SME borrowers are showing a consistent increase in late payments over the past 90 days.
The Macro Trigger Monitor detected a slowdown in manufacturing output (–2.3%) and a rise in local unemployment (+1.8%), both linked to higher delinquency risk.
I compared this credit-risk data with the Fraud Detection Connector, and it surfaced 7 overlapping customers who appear in both systems.
Confidence score for overlap: 0.87 (high)
Top contributing features:
Unusual transfer frequency
Spike in short-term credit utilization
Change in repayment cycle behavior
Insight summary (Explainability Card):
These overlaps suggest that some late payments may be driven by suspicious activity, not just market stress.
Insights from Payment Pattern Analyzer
Views both credit and fraud indicators together on one screen
Filter bar chart to high priority
Change
Accordion structure
Key findings, cross-system correlation, and insight summary each collapse into their own row, with checkmarks tracking completion state.
Change
Hover tooltip for agent
Clicking the agent hyperlink reveals an information card: agent name, tool, response timestamps, and a link to response events.
Change
Suggestion buttons
Three follow-up actions surface below the accordion, reducing the cognitive load of deciding what to do next.
Tradeoff
The accordion significantly improved scannability, and the tooltip gave power users access to agent metadata on demand. However, the hyperlink still felt like a UI pattern borrowed from the web rather than a native AI interface component — stakeholders flagged that it didn't clearly communicate "this came from an agent" to less technical users.
S
SAS Viya
Opened reports (1)
Dashboard canvas (scrolled)
SAS Viya Copilot
See how other industries are responding to inflation
Sure, Priya. I've compared recent payment behaviors with macroeconomic indicators to identify early warning signs. Here's what's showing up:
Key findings
›
Cross-system correlation
›
Insight summary
˅
These overlaps suggest that some late payments may be driven by suspicious activity, not just market stress. (via Risk Correlator Agent)
Information
Agent:Risk Correlator Agent
Tools:SAS Risk Tool
Show response events
Start time:9:10:41 AM
End time:9:10:49 AM
Run time:8 seconds
Add to report
Discard
⤢
Flag at-risk customers for review
Add to report
Compare industry responses
Final
Agent icon token
The hyperlink is replaced by an inline chip: a small icon mark + agent name, styled as a trusted source badge within the sentence flow.
Final
Non-disruptive, high trust
The token sits inline without breaking reading flow, yet is visually distinct enough to communicate agent provenance at a glance — no hover required.
Final
Lineage + feedback row
A model card lineage note and thumbs-up / flag / copy / audio row give users a direct way to act on or audit the Copilot response.
Outcome
The agent token pattern tested significantly better across all user archetypes — including non-technical stakeholders who had previously overlooked the hyperlink entirely. It established a reusable design pattern for communicating AI agent provenance that was adopted into the broader Viya Copilot design system.
S
SAS Viya
Opened reports (1)
Dashboard canvas (scrolled)
SAS Viya Copilot
Summary has been included. Lineage is linked to the model card for CreditRisk_v4.3.
See how other industries are responding to inflation
Sure, Priya. I've compared recent payment behaviors with macroeconomic indicators to identify early warning signs. Here's what's showing up:
Key findings
›
Cross-system correlation
›
Insight summary
˅
These overlaps suggest that some late payments may be driven by suspicious activity, not just market stress
(via Risk Correlator Agent).
Add to report
Discard
⤢
Outcome & Reflection
What we learned about designing for agentic uncertainty
The project confirmed that agentic AI UX cannot be designed in isolation from the underlying decision logic. The most impactful design decisions were not about the interface surface, but about where to place the boundaries of agent autonomy — and how to make those boundaries visible and adjustable in real time.
Clarity builds trust more than control
Transparency about agent reasoning reduced user anxiety more than expanded control — users wanted to understand, not override.
AI accelerates insight discovery
AI-assisted journey mapping surfaced friction points 3× faster than manual synthesis, enabling more iteration within the 6-month window.
Shared visuals align teams faster
Orchestration models became the most referenced artifact in cross-team sessions — shared visuals bridge design and engineering better than written specs.
Reflection
Designing for agentic AI is fundamentally a trust design problem. The hardest questions are not about capability — they're about when to show your work, when to ask permission, and when to act.